Discussion Question Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Discussion Question - Essay ExampleCulture of people varies as per their countries. Therefore leading movement is different in various countries. In this essay the leadership flare of Japan, Korea and China are discussed in detailed. All of these countries are in Asian continent but these countries make up different leadership styluss.Japan is one of the giant economic powers of the world. The country has developed its own leadership and management practices which matches with its culture. This country believes in capitalism ideology. This ideology helps Japan to preserve its culture against westernization. The leadership style of Japan is different from other countries. Power distance among Japanese people is high. Japanese people roost in a collective society. Therefore the leaders of Japan motivate the people in together with doing a clear. The leaders are very much respected by Japanese people. Participative leadership style is mostly followed by the leaders of this coun try. Another name of participative leadership is democratic leadership. In this type of leadership the team members take vital part in assisting the team leaders in making stopping point and strategies. The values and inputs of the team members are considered as important by the leaders1. The final decision is taken by the leader but the team members have strong involvement in the decision making process. In Japanese organizations and institution the leaders prefer to work collectively with the team members. The leaders communicate oftentimes with the team members for achieving the goals and objective of the team. The team members coordinate actively with the team leaders for completing whatsoever work successfully. The Japanese leaders always motivate the team members in performing their job efficiently. The opinions and the ideas given by the team members are considered as very important by the leaders. So while developing any strategy or decision the Japanese leaders analyze t he views and